I bought this book because I loved Tipping Point but it kind of disappointed me. To be fair, it would be hard to live up to a book like Tipping Point. All said and done, Gladwell is an amazing writer and although there are no earth shattering insights in the book, you still don’t feel like abandoning it.
Blink talks about the power of flash decisions, those which are not thought out, but just happen. It mainly deals with how intuitive decisions take place. They are very powerful yet sometimes go terribly wrong. Here are some interesting thoughts from the book.
Let us say I ask you to recall the face of a waiter who served you last time you went to a restaurant. Now if I ask you to pick this person from a police line-up would you be able to do it? Apparently you would. But, suppose I ask you to take a pen and paper and write down as much detail as you can of the person. Apparently you will do lot worse in picking the face from the police line-up. Verbally describing a face impairs your ability to recognize it!!!
Here is an interesting Psychology test to help you understand the power of the subconscious. In the table below, assign each name to a category
Male Female
——– John ———
——– Bob ———
——– Amy ———
——– Holly ———
——– Joan ———
——– Derek ———
It was easy. Now try this
European American African American
Or or
Bad Good
——– Hurt ——–
——– Evil ——–
——– Glorious ——–
——– Wonderful ——–
Was it as easy as the first one? This is called the implicit association test (IAT), you can take it online at www.implicit.harvard.edu. We can make connection between two ideas which are already related in our mind more easily then we do between pairs of ideas which are unrelated. For most people, it is much harder to put glorious and wonderful with good when it is paired with African American. That is the power of the subconscious. Our stated and conscious position on racism may be very different from what we feel at an unconscious level.
Another very interesting example is from the world of classical music. Until recently it was a dominated by white men. It was believed that women could not play like men. In recent times the musicians established a union and many rules were formulated for the selection process. During the selection process, participants were identified by numbers and had to perform behind a screen. So selectors have no knowledge of who is performing. Since this practice was established the number of women in the top US orchestra has increased five fold.
The point that should be noted in these examples is that none of these people were consciously gender biased or racist but the subconscious is so powerful that one is not even aware of its influence.
I was talking to my friend last week. She was very upset about how people treat gays and transgenders in India. She was talking about establishing a school for them to run. I asked her if anyone would put their children in such a school. Even I wouldn’t. Believe me, I understand their problems and empathize with their issues. But, would I trust them with my son? Honestly, I don’t think so.
If not anything, Blink made me examine my own prejudices and I think I will be less judgmental about others’ henceforth.
Nice review.I was looking forward to it.Ill try to read tipping point first..Hows the deepavali preparations going chechi?
Seems like an interesting book. Great review Archana!! Oh last week even I was discussing with a friend about gays&transgenders and their plight after reading the news about Dumbledore being a gay. But as you said, though I really empathize with them, it will be difficult to show the empathy in action. It’s like easier said than done.
I loved your last sentence. I sometimes draw judgements on people based on their views or opinions and now I know its wrong.
@Rajiv – Thank you. Do let me know what think of tipping point. No much going on in Diwali front. Its been very busy at office. It must be pretty grand at Malasia, after all it is Chechi’s first Diwali after marraige. Is she going to be there for Diwali.
@Saraswathi – Thank you very much. Dubledore being Gay did not matter a wee bit to me. I simply adore him and he continues to be my favorite character in HP. I was so unhappy when JKR killed him in Book6. I don’t know what all the fuss is about.
Even I used to be very judgemental, Saraswathi. It changed after I became a mother. Nothing like it to mellow you
Nice review Archana. Yes Blink is not as good as Tipping Point. But Blink raises some important questions and also throws some important light on gut instinct which is generally dismissed by the analytics oriented folks.
You may also want to read Freakonomics. The conflicting explanations given by the Freakonomics authors for the drop in NYC’s crime rate is very interesting. Both authors also had a online spat about it on their respective blogs. I covered it in my blog a while ago.
Thank you Sukumar. Could you provide the link to the blog post?
Archana,
I am half done with Blink and based on the anecdotes, I was amazed at how our gut/subconscious has an impact on the decisions we make. However, Caldwell also stresses when it is relevant to trust your instincts and when it is not. I particularly liked the pepsi/new coke example and the misleading conclusion one could arrive at based on raw data.
I typically like anecdotal style of writing with examples/real-life scenarios and this book suits me fine from that angle. Looking forward to reading rest of the book.
Of course, the IAT was an eye-opener. As much as we would like to believe that we do not make any judgments/conclusions based on gender/race/ethnicity, it just is not the case. What we can do is to keep training our mind to alleviate itself of such bias and realize that such training can never stop. Our upbringing, society, religion, friendships have ingrained these biases deep in our conscience and it is an everyday exercise to free ourselves of such biases.
Having said that, I am a reasonable believer in the “gut instinct” decisions and more often than not, the first solution I come up with for a problem has proven to be the right one. Knowing this, I now have to make a conscious decision to not always rely on this first solution and keep digging at alternate ones that may prove to be more fruitful.
Ganesh
Thanks Ganesh. The Pepsi example was brilliant, I liked even the example of the cop who never shot the teenager with a gun in his hand. He contrasts this with the cops who shot an unarmed man assuming he was armed.
As I said, Galdwell is a intelligent writer. If you read Blink without comparing it with Tipping point, it is a great book.
It is very frightening that biases can run so deep and have such big impact on our decisions. That is one big take away for me, from this book.
Archana: Now you are past Blink, you may want to read the “Gut Feelings” by Gerd Gigerenzer of the Max Planck Institut in Germany. One of the comments above says gut feelings are dismissed by analytic people. Gigerenzer’s work is cited in Blink and you can see that analytic people can explain that gut feeling thing, analytically
Gladwell is a journalist, who translated the ‘the idea whose time is right’ into ‘Tipping Point’ by using story telling well. ‘Blink’ was a bit disappointing. The ideas of ‘beyond rationality’ and ‘tipping points’ have existed in academic literature and policy practitioner lingo since the 1950s. I should know – that is what my doctoral work is about.
Ganesh,
Great comment.
Archana,
Here is the link to my post on Freakonomics and the spat.
http://sastwingees.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2006/10/18/2425538.html
Shefaly,
I made the comment above. Since your doctoral work is on this topic, please explain your comment a bit more. Or maybe you can write a blog post. Would love to read it.
To explain what I said a bit more – generally most decision making scripts talk about collecting a lot of data and making an analytical decision. As you say I’m sure Gladwell is not the first person to write on this. But when a popular writer writes on a topic it reaches more people -what can I say, a simple fact of life.
Thank you Shefaly. I will check out Gut Feeling. What exactly was a your doctoral work about. Would love to know more, if you don’t mind sharing.
And welcome to my blog.
Archana,
Although i need some time to put in my thoughts on your post, i have another angle to the views expressed by you..
Can we apply these research exactly to our own people? For example, the sub-conscious racism of the west is different from the caste based bias of our people.. in the former, the racism extends to war where the other race is either driven out or extincted (in case of assyrians), whereas in our caste based society, its either dominance or isolation from the other castes. The very fact that thousands of castes co-existed each other for more than 3000 years, underlines the basic difference b/w racism & castes.
probably, we need to find out in what are the way’s gladwell’s research fits us…
I am not justifying anything here, but i feel the underlying psychology differs a lot b/w the west & us..
The treatment of gays/transgenders varies according to the society.. but to my view, the gays are more to do with the upbringing..
When our religion proved that there are ways to even overcome basic natural desires, i feel, the problem of gay would be overcome by the same..
We can find lot of information, if we analyse people brought in various cultures… Most of the gay reports arise from big cities, and that too who went out of the cultural bond..
(I may be wrong.. will be glad to know further views)
Senthil – Those are very interesting observations. IMHO, caste is even more entrenched than race. How many people marry outside their caste. How many prejudices do you carry about people from other castes? If your implication is we are not as racist as the westerners, I would tend to disagree.
Regarding gay being a social conditioning, there is lot of research to prove otherwise. It has been more or less proven that it is a genetic predisposition. Even great artists like Da Vinci are thought to be Gay.
Whatever I understood from you comment, you are saying why should Gays not control their basic natural desires. When same religion solemnizes marriage and does not expect majority of its population to be celibate, is it fair to expect it out of gays.
You say most of gays are from big cities. Maybe most of the reported cases are from big cities, I don’t think it does not happen in the villages. Even in ancient Sanskrit literature (including Manu) there are references to Gay people.
Archana.. I am in complete disagreement with your opinions.. Infact, i would like to understand things beyond our opinion..
Firstly, i strongly believe, that we are NOT at all a racist.. I strongly rely on the past history to arrive at this conclusion.. What i interfere from the past history are:
1. The Racism characterised by mutually exclusive group of people, strongly associated with their land or ideology. For eg, the jews, arabs, britons, french, greeks are all parts of region based racism.
The worst racist wars happened when israel was destroyed by romans. Elimination of assyrians.. all these wars are waged by homogenous group of people, affiliated to a region.
2. Racism associated with ideology is also exclusive, and intends to drive away all those who does not believe the ideology. Eg: the complete annihilation of persian, babylonian, egyptian, greak, roman cultures by both christianity and islam.
3. The whites committed racist atrocities on North American Red Indians, wiping out 90% of the population. The entire australian aborigines wiped out. Their utter racism on African Blacks, making them slaves and treating them worser than animals, till a century ago.
I request you to prove if any of such things happened in our composite society of India. There were war only b/w kshatriyas of kingdoms, and not among the common people..
I am really surprised on how you can compare Elimination of an entire race, on an equal footing to caste based issues like untouchability… I feel, its like equating a petty thief stealing a pencil with a brutal murderer.. Both are wrong.. but we know the difference right..
All the definitions of racism was formulated by the west, and i hereby again repeat that the western society is completely different from India society.
Please note this important point.. Thousands of caste groups co-existed for more than 3000 years, in india, having strong interdependancy on one another. This is in straight contradiction to the western mode of racism, where on race eliminated the other race completely.
(If you take any of the village, you can find out atleast 15-20 castes living along with each other…)
regarding gene theory for gays, i would like to point out the instances where they proved that even atheists are because of gene. But, kannadhasan, who was one of the most staunch atheists, turned out to be the devotee of Lord Krishna.. I was an atheist during my child hood,.. we have instances where persons like shyam sunder in our company, stated that they moved on from atheism to theism..
We are so obsessed with whatever happens in the west. Their research is entirely based on their society, and particularly the current state of society.
Suppose, tomorrow, if they come with another proof that circumstances constitute 90% for gays, the we would suddenly change our opinion too.. Why we are not analysing their findings with our own experience, and our own understanding of our society. Are we not simply believing what is written in newspaper articles?
Please excuse me, if i appear to be harsh or aggressive).
/*** How many people marry outside their caste? **//
This is a question that all asks without putting any thoughts on it.. My take on this is Why do we expect people to marry outside their caste? Does marrying within the same caste a sin, or crime?
This problem mostly comes out of lovers from different caste.. But, arent this issue more serious in the religions too? Going in this way, arent the discrimination more serious in the religions than in castes?
I expect you to say “Religion and caste are different.”.. In that case, please explain, how they are different. My contend on this is that these discrimination and marriage issue is far more serious in religions than in castes.
Ok.. have we ever introspected, why people resist inter-caste marriages?
Let’s quote from our own life too. Marriage is an inseparable event of all families. How do we conduct our marriage? We invite a purohit, invite a nathaswara vidvan (in tamilnadu), and there are lot other people, we have access to, and we conduct a successful marriage by using them. Now, who are those purohits, and how they are grown up.
Can we create a dedicated purohit from the general public? But you may acknowledge that purohit are the important person conducting the marriage in each hindu family. Not only marriage, they perform various other rituals, like baby naming, death rituals etc.
When we analyse, they were so cultured only because of their caste, and the associated life style…
Definitely, you wont accept, suppose if i learn the mantra from some institute as 3 month course and offer for conducting the marriage for your son/daughter.. right..
.. we know the difference b/w learning a ritual, and living a ritual..
I quoted purohit as an example.. Our society is bound to collapse completely.. you know why.. due to collapse of caste system.. (It may appear as rubbish.. but its the bitter truth).. For thousands of years, people in my community, did not leave agriculture even in extreme conditions, thus gauranteeing the source of food for the society. Today, most of the people moved away from it.. Both farmer and the farm labourers moved away.
We will realise the gravity of situation, only when it arrives. The recent food riots all over West Bengal, is just a symptom..
Some may say “We can import food with the money we have”.. Its all easily said.. From where we will import, and what will happen, if enough food is not available for import?
Secondly, which country is equipped to support such a huge population of 1.2 billion.
Thank you Senthil. Thats a lot of information. But this post is neither about histroy nor about western Vs Eastern values. The book talks about how subconsious influences our judgement.
I don’t want to comment about the history. Take the current situation. Most people have consious, stated opinions about castes and religions. If we were to design an IAT for an Indian context, how many people would associate intelligence and schedule caste? We think Brahmins are intelligent, chettiars are stingy, muslims are dirty (one muslim lady actually told me that she had great difficulty finding a house because the general belief was that they would not keep the house clean). All of us carry our prejudices. While marrying inside the same caste had some advantages it also creats clear divisions in the society, I am talking about current day and age, not the past.
Are you suggesting we are beyond such subconcious influences?
Regarding gays, I want to understand your stand better. Are you saying that it is unnatural and hence they need to be converted to ‘normal’ sexual orientation. Thats what I could gather from atheist, theist example.
Thanks archana. I agree that this book is not about history. But we need to consider the enivronment, and the base the author took for his research. I feel, all his findings were entirely based on his own society & people, and hence may not fit to us. My opinion is that we cannot entirely fit that for our people, and in turn needs some research on how & where it differs.
I agree your point on the castes too. There are prejudices. But, that cannot be considered racial prejudice.. rather these prejudices are more to do with cultural and lifestyles associated with the caste, and not on just the name of the caste. (Why chettiars are considered stingy.. its due to their business lifestyle,)
Even in our internal blog, anusha expressed openly her prejudice on the rural india (urban vs rural division).. Prejudices always exists everywhere, but the mode and severity differs..
We cannot say ours is a racial prejudice..
Secondly, you havent answered my question on Purohits, who are the lifeline of our culture. What are we going to do, without such class. Are we ready to have just receptions and finalise the marriage..
Caste creates divisions, but, its not the only division existing so far. There are lot other divisions. We learned to exist with regional & linguistic divisions, religious division etc. But why only caste is ridiculed so much.
The peace lies in accepting the divisions, and moving forward.
My next question.. why dont we see the positive side of the castes.. why dont we see the numerous cultures associated with each caste, which all would be lost, on collapse of caste system. Even people of SC caste do not feel shy of their caste.. because, caste is a social asset for a people where they get support and attachment.
And we cannot ignore the past and narrow down ourselves only to the present (this is a problem with us all these days). Present is a continuation of the past, and when we dont understand the root of a problem, we could not have a solution.. and past has the real cause for this problem.. (when we see history, all incidents take place as chain reaction)
(i will do a post in my blog on this aspect soon..)
Regarding gay, based on my observation so far, those people who are within the cultural bond, tends to be normal people. When we are aware of the cultural values, there cannot be gays.
(since marriages happen early on those days, i feel, there was very rare occurance such gays in our society in the past).
My opinion is that gays are a sign of mental disorder, and should have psychatry treatment. The utter basic reason is that it doesnt confine to nature, and not well for the society.
Just for an example, what is that makes so much of people rever women even today. Its the inherent culture .. right..
When we see our freedom struggle, there is an incident where chandrasekara azad after becoming militant raids a house for money. When the women folks in that house started attacking, he retreated without retaliating.. later when every one reviewed the events, they do not repend for their failure, but were satisfied, because, they havent done anything harm to the women folks of that rich family.
What is that make their noble characteristics, contrary to the normal thiefs & raiders who would have behaved differently to the women..
The social values, and cultural upbringing has strong effect on the behaviour of a man. (I hope you would agree on this.)
Your comment#17 is what my stand.. (if any of our close relatives, say our brother, choose to be gay, can we accept it??)
Senthil – You are entitled to your opinion about caste prejudice being different from racial prejudice. I feel we are just arguing over the semantics. That is my opinion and I guess I will change it when I am conviced. As of now, I am not.
Regarding your stand on Gays, I am sure many people who read it are going to be offended. Whether I will accept a close person if he chooses to be gay, I will not be happy about it mainly because he is going to face lot of discrimination in our society not because I object to their orientation. I think the most important thing in life is not to be judgemental. Only then any learning can happen.
If you have me pick one value which I feel is most important in life, it is kindness. When you have such a strong stand on gays even though so much research has gone into proving otherwise, I wonder how you can claim to have no prejudice. To me this is also racism.
The only reason I am not deleting your comments in because I said in my post, I am going to be less judgemental about other peoples prejudices.
Nice review, Archu.
Archana,
I just expressed my thoughts after putting some thoughts on it, in our own perspective. I just presented an alternative facts. Thanks for your patience shown on me.
Before concluding, i want to make clear that i made my analysis on the following base points.
1. The research done in west may not fit as it is to our own society.
2. Races are exclusive, and prey on one another, while caste is mutually inclusive, and depend on one another in various aspects.
I am sorry for my straight forward comments offending any one. Thanks for all your patience.
I refer to #13 by Senthill at point 3 that “The entire australian aborigines wiped out.”
They were not.
Thanks Meagen. I will let Senthil know.
Meagen.. Thanks for pointing out. Its a wrong statement on my side. aborigines are present even today.
Its said that their population was estimated to be reduced to 90% of their original before british settlement.
I also came across the following articles, which gave me a new look in to the history. I was surprised, that till very recently, as much as 1992, the aborigines were not recognized by australian government, and the land was considered as no-man territory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_nullius
The following link would give us an inside view of the stituation of aborigines in australia today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians
Racism still exists today in australia. One of relative got an australian visa, but he could not get a job there, because of racial preference of the general australian business communities. I dont know if it amounts to racism, but, i have heard the same from many persons, who have now shifted to US from australia.
Archana,
I would like your comments on the following points
Till 1992, the aborigines were not recognized properly, their land rights not accepted, and their repeated approach to the court, blatantly rejected.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_nullius
Contrary to this, in our country, almost all the castes has been given equal rights, and in some way, the classified upper castes were more discriminated, favouring lower castes.
But, still we criticise about ouselves.
So, what would be your opinion on the above two situations.. where in one colonised country, the native people were denied of their historic land rights , as recent as 1992, while, in our country, the discriminated people are given enough pushup, right from independence.